How long to recover from interruption

And you might need to take 23 minutes and 15 seconds to get back on track. Taking breaks during your workday is a healthy habit and will help you to be more productive in the long run. Help yourself to focus by cutting out as many distractions as you can. Wong, K. How long it takes to get back on track after a distraction. Reducing the disruptive effects of interruption: a cognitive framework for analysing the costs and benefits of intervention strategies.

Borst, J. What makes interruptions disruptive? Brumby, D. Computational models of user multitasking. Oulasvirta, P. Kristensson, X. Howes eds. Computational Interaction Design. Recovering from an interruption: investigating speed-accuracy tradeoffs in task resumption strategy.

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19, Card, S. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Carrier, L. Causes, effects, and practicalities of everyday multitasking. Developmental Review, 35, Czerwinski, M. A diary study of task switching and interruptions. Farmer, G.

Dividing attention between tasks: testing whether explicit payoff functions elicit optimal dual-task performance. Cognitive Science. Fogarty, J. Predicting human interruptibility with sensors. Fong, A. A predictive model of emergency physician task resumption following interruptions. Gould, S. What does it mean for an interruption to be relevant?

An investigation of relevance as a memory effect. Diminished control in crowdsourcing: an investigation of crowdworker multitasking behavior.

Hodgetts, H. Interruption of the Tower of London task: Support for a goal activation approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, , Hudson, J. Iqbal, S. Effects of intelligent notification management on users and their tasks. Disruption and recovery of computing tasks: field study, analysis, and directions. Notifications and awareness: a field study of alert usage and preferences. Towards an index of opportunity: understanding changes in mental workload during task execution.

Oasis: A framework for linking notification delivery to the perceptual structure of goal-directed tasks. Janssen, C. Strategic adaptation to task characteristics, incentives, and individual differences in dual-tasking. Identifying optimum performance trade-offs using a cognitively bounded rational analysis model of discretionary task interleaving.

Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, — Integrating knowledge of multitasking and Interruptions across different perspectives and research methods. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 79, 1—5.

Jin, J. Self-interruption on the computer: a typology of discretionary task interleaving. Kushlev, K. Checking e-mail less frequently reduces stress. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, Li, S.

The effect of interruptions on postcompletion and other procedural errors: an account based on the activation-based goal memory model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, — Mark, G.

No task left behind? Focused, aroused, but so distractible: temporal perspectives on multitasking and communications. Mason, M. Wandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science, , Meyer, A. The work life of developers: activities, switches and perceived productivity.

Monk, C. The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, Newell, A. Unified Theories of Cognition. Olmstead, K. Social media and the workplace. Pew Research Center. Rouncefield, M. A, Rodden, T. Salvucci, D. Rapid prototyping and evaluation of in-vehicle interfaces. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 16, Article 9.

The Multitasking Mind. Trafton, J. Task interruptions. Boehm-Davis Ed. A memory for goals model of sequence errors. Cognitive Systems Research, 12, — Trougakos, J.

Making the break count: an episodic examination of recovery activities, emotional experiences, and positive affective displays. Academy of Management Journal, 51, Webster, J. Audience engagement in multi-media presentations. Wickens, C. Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors, 50, Zeigarnik, B. Das Behalten erledigter und unerledigter Handlungen. Psychologische Forschung, 9, Translated in English as: Zeigarnik, B.

On finished and unfinished tasks. Ellis Ed. Interruptibility of software developers and its prediction using psycho-physiological sensors. The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the work's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if such material is not included in the work's Creative Commons license and the respective action is not permitted by statutory regulation, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to duplicate, adapt or reproduce the material.

Skip to main content Skip to sections. This service is more advanced with JavaScript available. Advertisement Hide. How Do Interruptions Affect Productivity? Authors Authors and affiliations Duncan P. Brumby Christian P. Janssen Gloria Mark. Open Access. First Online: 08 May Download chapter PDF. Introduction When was the last time you were interrupted at work?

In this chapter, we provide a brief overview of three prominent and complementary research methods that have been used to study interruptions. The methods we review are as follows: Controlled experiments that demonstrate that interruptions take time to recover from and lead to errors Cognitive models that offer a theoretical framework for explaining why and how interruptions are disruptive Observational studies that give a rich description of the kinds of interruptions that people experience in the workplace.

What Is the Aim of an Experiment? A Typical Interruptions Experiment In a typical interruptions experiment, the researcher will ask a participant to work on a contrived task that they have designed. How Is Disruptiveness of an Interruption Measured? Interruptions Cause Errors When a person resumes a task following an interruption, it often matters whether they get it right or make a mistake. Summary: Controlled Experiments By conducting controlled experiments, researchers have been able to establish that task interruptions take time to recover from and lead to errors.

What Are Cognitive Models? Summary: Cognitive Models Cognitive models develop our understanding of why and how interruptions are disruptive. Observational Studies of the Workplace Most in-situ studies of interruptions have been conducted in the workplace.

Related: 3 Ways to End Technology Distraction. Rather than try to get back in the zone as quickly as possible, take a couple of minutes to regain your composure before you look at what you were doing. Allow yourself to sit for a moment thinking about the task in front of you. What do you need to accomplish by finishing this project? What is your strategy for doing so?

Which part of the project is the highest priority, and how should you approach it? By asking these questions, you reorient your mind to the task at hand and greatly reduce how much time it takes to regain full focus. Then, you return from the interruption with no idea where all your great ideas went. Instead, create a short note to outline what you just finished and where you plan to go next.

You can retain your approachable charm without sacrificing your productivity in the bargain. Reserve this solution for situations when you will get the most from your uninterrupted time. And if you're feeling guilty as a business leader, remember that your time is ultimately the most expensive for the company to lose.

The more you practice recovery from interruptions, the more productive your workdays will become. Ben Angel. Max Pecherskyi. Alp Mimaroglu. Julia Weikel.