Why qualitative methodology

Qualitative researchers usually try to make a complex picture of a research issue or problem. Researchers describe the perspectives and factors associated with the problem as a whole. The following are the strategies in qualitative research:. The following are strategies that need to be carried out in qualitative research:.

Qualitative observation Qualitative observation is an observation in which the researcher goes directly to the field to observe participant behavior and activities at the research location. In this observation, the researcher can record and record both structured and unstructured notes. Usually researchers are involved in a variety of roles, it can be as a complete participant or non-participant. Qualitative interview In qualitative interviews, qualitative researchers can interview face-to-face or face to face with participants, by telephone, or can also be involved in focus group interviews or group interviews.

The questions are unstructured and open questions for the purpose of capturing the opinions and views of participants on a particular issue.

Quality documents Qualitative documents can be public documents such as newspapers, magazines or papers or in the form of personal documents such as diaries, diaries and e-mails.

Audio and visual material This data can be in the form of recordings of both sound and images and printed results such as pictures, photographs and paintings.

That was a little explanation about qualitative research methods, hopefully they can provide benefits. Source: Creswell, J. However, the aim is not the same as in RCT protocols, i. In the methods section, the focus is on transparency of the methods used, including why, how and by whom they were implemented in the specific study setting, so as to enable a discussion of whether and how this may have influenced data collection, analysis and interpretation. The results section usually starts with a paragraph outlining the main findings, followed by more detailed descriptions of, for example, the commonalities, discrepancies or exceptions per category [ 20 ].

Here it is important to support main findings by relevant quotations, which may add information, context, emphasis or real-life examples [ 20 , 23 ]. It is subject to debate in the field whether it is relevant to state the exact number or percentage of respondents supporting a certain statement e.

Reasons for combining methods can be diverse, including triangulation for corroboration of findings, complementarity for illustration and clarification of results, expansion to extend the breadth and range of the study, explanation of unexpected results generated with one method with the help of another, or offsetting the weakness of one method with the strength of another [ 1 , 17 , 24 , 25 , 26 ].

The three most common types of mixed method designs are the convergent parallel design , the explanatory sequential design and the exploratory sequential design. The designs with examples are shown in Fig. In the convergent parallel design, a qualitative study is conducted in parallel to and independently of a quantitative study, and the results of both studies are compared and combined at the stage of interpretation of results.

Using the above example of EVT provision, this could entail setting up a quantitative EVT registry to measure process times and patient outcomes in parallel to conducting the qualitative research outlined above, and then comparing results. In the explanatory sequential design, a quantitative study is carried out first, followed by a qualitative study to help explain the results from the quantitative study.

This would be an appropriate design if the registry alone had revealed relevant delays in door-to-needle times and the qualitative study would be used to understand where and why these occurred, and how they could be improved.

In the exploratory design, the qualitative study is carried out first and its results help informing and building the quantitative study in the next step [ 26 ]. If the qualitative study around EVT provision had shown a high level of dissatisfaction among the staff members involved, a quantitative questionnaire investigating staff satisfaction could be set up in the next step, informed by the qualitative study on which topics dissatisfaction had been expressed.

Amongst other things, the questionnaire design would make it possible to widen the reach of the research to more respondents from different types of hospitals, regions, countries or settings, and to conduct sub-group analyses for different professional groups.

A variety of assessment criteria and lists have been developed for qualitative research, ranging in their focus and comprehensiveness [ 14 , 17 , 27 ]. In the following, we therefore focus on a set of commonly used assessment criteria that, from a practical standpoint, a researcher can look for when assessing a qualitative research report or paper.

Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research SRQR to make sure all items that are relevant for this type of research are addressed [ 23 , 28 ]. Discussions of quantitative measures in addition to or instead of these qualitative measures can be a sign of lower quality of the research paper.

Providing and adhering to a checklist for qualitative research contributes to an important quality criterion for qualitative research, namely transparency [ 15 , 17 , 23 ]. While methodological transparency and complete reporting is relevant for all types of research, some additional criteria must be taken into account for qualitative research. This includes what is called reflexivity, i.

Depending on the research question and population to be researched this can be limited to professional experience, but it may also include gender, age or ethnicity [ 17 , 27 ]. These details are relevant because in qualitative research, as opposed to quantitative research, the researcher as a person cannot be isolated from the research process [ 23 ]. It may influence the conversation when an interviewed patient speaks to an interviewer who is a physician, or when an interviewee is asked to discuss a gynaecological procedure with a male interviewer, and therefore the reader must be made aware of these details [ 19 ].

An iterative sampling approach is advised, in which data collection e. This process continues until no new relevant information can be found and further sampling becomes redundant — which is called saturation [ 1 , 15 ]. In other words: qualitative data collection finds its end point not a priori , but when the research team determines that saturation has been reached [ 29 , 30 ].

This is also the reason why most qualitative studies use deliberate instead of random sampling strategies.

Other types of purposive sampling include but are not limited to maximum variation sampling, critical case sampling or extreme or deviant case sampling [ 2 ]. Assessors of qualitative research should check whether the considerations underlying the sampling strategy were sound and whether or how researchers tried to adapt and improve their strategies in stepwise or cyclical approaches between data collection and analysis to achieve saturation [ 14 ].

Good qualitative research is iterative in nature, i. One example of this are pilot interviews, where different aspects of the interview especially the interview guide, but also, for example, the site of the interview or whether the interview can be audio-recorded are tested with a small number of respondents, evaluated and revised [ 19 ].

In doing so, the interviewer learns which wording or types of questions work best, or which is the best length of an interview with patients who have trouble concentrating for an extended time. Of course, the same reasoning applies to observations or focus groups which can also be piloted.

Ideally, coding should be performed by at least two researchers, especially at the beginning of the coding process when a common approach must be defined, including the establishment of a useful coding list or tree , and when a common meaning of individual codes must be established [ 23 ].

An initial sub-set or all transcripts can be coded independently by the coders and then compared and consolidated after regular discussions in the research team. This is to make sure that codes are applied consistently to the research data. Member checking, also called respondent validation , refers to the practice of checking back with study respondents to see if the research is in line with their views [ 14 , 27 ].

This can happen after data collection or analysis or when first results are available [ 23 ]. For example, interviewees can be provided with summaries of their transcripts and asked whether they believe this to be a complete representation of their views or whether they would like to clarify or elaborate on their responses [ 17 ].

In those niches where qualitative approaches have been able to evolve and grow, a new trend has seen the inclusion of patients and their representatives not only as study participants i. The underlying assumption is that patients and other stakeholders hold unique perspectives and experiences that add value beyond their own single story, making the research more relevant and beneficial to researchers, study participants and future patients alike [ 34 , 35 ]. In this sense, the involvement of the relevant stakeholders, especially patients and relatives, is increasingly being seen as a quality indicator in and of itself.

The above overview does not include certain items that are routine in assessments of quantitative research. What follows is a non-exhaustive, non-representative, experience-based list of the quantitative criteria often applied to the assessment of qualitative research, as well as an explanation of the limited usefulness of these endeavours.

Given the openness and flexibility of qualitative research, it should not be assessed by how well it adheres to pre-determined and fixed strategies — in other words: its rigidity. Instead, the assessor should look for signs of adaptation and refinement based on lessons learned from earlier steps in the research process. For the reasons explained above, qualitative research does not require specific sample sizes, nor does it require that the sample size be determined a priori [ 1 , 14 , 27 , 37 , 38 , 39 ].

Sample size can only be a useful quality indicator when related to the research purpose, the chosen methodology and the composition of the sample, i. While some authors argue that randomisation can be used in qualitative research, this is not commonly the case, as neither its feasibility nor its necessity or usefulness has been convincingly established for qualitative research [ 13 , 27 ]. Qualitative studies do not use control groups, either.

However, it is not clear what this measure tells us about the quality of the analysis [ 23 ]. This means that these scores can be included in qualitative research reports, preferably with some additional information on what the score means for the analysis, but it is not a requirement.

Experiences even show that it might be better to have the same person or team perform all of these tasks [ 20 ]. First, when researchers introduce themselves during recruitment this can enhance trust when the interview takes place days or weeks later with the same researcher.

Second, when the audio-recording is transcribed for analysis, the researcher conducting the interviews will usually remember the interviewee and the specific interview situation during data analysis. This might be helpful in providing additional context information for interpretation of data, e. Being qualitative research instead of quantitative research should not be used as an assessment criterion if it is used irrespectively of the research problem at hand.

Similarly, qualitative research should not be required to be combined with quantitative research per se — unless mixed methods research is judged as inherently better than single-method research. In this case, the same criterion should be applied for quantitative studies without a qualitative component.

The main take-away points of this paper are summarised in Table 1. We aimed to show that, if conducted well, qualitative research can answer specific research questions that cannot to be adequately answered using only quantitative designs.

It also provides us with a greater range of tools to tackle a greater range of research problems more appropriately and successfully, filling in the blind spots on one half of the methodological spectrum to better address the whole complexity of neurological research and practice.

Philipsen, H. Kwalitatief onderzoek: nuttig, onmisbaar en uitdagend. TCo Eds. In: Qualitative research: Practical methods for medical practice pp. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum. Chapter Google Scholar. Punch, K. Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches.

London: Sage. Kelly, J. Travelling to the city for hospital care: Access factors in country aboriginal patient journeys. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 22 3 , — Article Google Scholar. Nilsen, P. Never the twain shall meet?

Implementation Science, 8 1 , 1— Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine. Qualitative Observation is a process of research that uses subjective methodologies to gather systematic information or data. Since, the focus on qualitative observation is the research process of using subjective methodologies to gather information or data.

Qualitative observation is primarily used to equate quality differences. Qualitative observation deals with the 5 major sensory organs and their functioning — sight, smell, touch, taste, and hearing.

Qualitative data collection allows collecting data that is non-numeric and helps us to explore how decisions are made and provide us with detailed insight. For reaching such conclusions the data that is collected should be holistic, rich, and nuanced and findings to emerge through careful analysis.

For example, if the qualitative data is collected through a focus group or one-to-one discussion, there will be handwritten notes or video recorded tapes.

If there are recording they should be transcribed and before the process of data analysis can begin. Qualitative data analysis such as notes, videos, audio recordings images, and text documents.

One of the most used methods for qualitative data analysis is text analysis. Text analysis is a data analysis method that is distinctly different from all other qualitative research methods, where researchers analyze the social life of the participants in the research study and decode the words, actions, etc. There are images also that are used in this research study and the researchers analyze the context in which the images are used and draw inferences from them.

In the last decade, text analysis through what is shared on social media platforms has gained supreme popularity. An online community of members who were the loyal patrons of the bookstore were interviewed and related questions were asked and the questions were answered by them. At the end of the interview, it was realized that most of the books in the stores were suitable for adults and there were not enough options for children or teenagers. By conducting this qualitative research the bookstore owner realized what the shortcomings were and what were the feelings of the readers.

Through this research now the bookstore owner can now keep books for different age categories and can improve his sales and customer outreach. Such qualitative research method examples can serve as the basis to indulge in further quantitative research, which provides remedies.

Researchers make use of qualitative research techniques when they need to capture accurate, in-depth insights. Here are some examples of when to use qualitative research. The basic differences between qualitative research methods and quantitative research methods are simple and straightforward. They differ in:. Though you're welcome to continue on your mobile screen, we'd suggest a desktop or notebook experience for optimal results. Survey software Leading survey software to help you turn data into decisions.

Research Edition Intelligent market research surveys that uncover actionable insights. Customer Experience Experiences change the world. Deliver the best with our CX management software. Workforce Powerful insights to help you create the best employee experience. What is qualitative research? Gather research insights Types of qualitative research methods with examples Qualitative research methods are designed in a manner that help reveal the behavior and perception of a target audience with reference to a particular topic.

Also, read about qualitative research examples : 1. Qualitative research question examples How does social media shape body image in teenagers? How do children and adults interpret healthy eating in the UK? What factors influence employee retention in a large organization?

How is anxiety experienced around the world? How can teachers integrate social issues into science curriculums? Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services Trustpilot. What are the main qualitative research approaches? There are five common approaches to qualitative research : Grounded theory involves collecting data in order to develop new theories. Ethnography involves immersing yourself in a group or organization to understand its culture.

Narrative research involves interpreting stories to understand how people make sense of their experiences and perceptions. Action research links theory and practice in several cycles to drive innovative changes. What is data collection? How do you analyze qualitative data? There are various approaches to qualitative data analysis , but they all share five steps in common: Prepare and organize your data. Review and explore your data. Develop a data coding system. Assign codes to the data.

Identify recurring themes. Is this article helpful?